Just started learning efs and created my first system complete with buy/sell/short/cover signals. A lot of help came from the Guide to Creating EFS Strategies.
What I'd like to do at this point is learn how to scale in additional positions after an initial signal is generated. For instance, I receive a buy signal and execute a first leg. If it goes against me $.50, I add a second leg, and so on up to five legs or some variable. Once a sell condition hits, I'd unload all legs. Vice-versa on the shorts.
In the EFS Guide, I read the section on local and global variables, as well as the sample code for profit targets and stops, but I'm not sure if they would apply in my case. I also scanned the boards, but didn't see any threads on this subject. Nothing in the EFS example library either. I assume this is something that can't be programmed with the formula wizard.
Can someone point me to some threads or post an example efs file or two that does this? I'm pretty good at figuring things out as long as I have an example to look at. Otherwise I tend to make things more complicated than they need to be.
Thanks in advance,
Derek
What I'd like to do at this point is learn how to scale in additional positions after an initial signal is generated. For instance, I receive a buy signal and execute a first leg. If it goes against me $.50, I add a second leg, and so on up to five legs or some variable. Once a sell condition hits, I'd unload all legs. Vice-versa on the shorts.
In the EFS Guide, I read the section on local and global variables, as well as the sample code for profit targets and stops, but I'm not sure if they would apply in my case. I also scanned the boards, but didn't see any threads on this subject. Nothing in the EFS example library either. I assume this is something that can't be programmed with the formula wizard.
Can someone point me to some threads or post an example efs file or two that does this? I'm pretty good at figuring things out as long as I have an example to look at. Otherwise I tend to make things more complicated than they need to be.
Thanks in advance,
Derek
Comment