Dana
When I calculate out the position size I get 36 shares based on your parameters. My calculation allows for brokerage in & out ( A$33 each way in Australia)
( $35.93 - $32.23) / ($200 - (2*$33)) = 36 shares
This method takes account of your 2% risk management limit on your equity base and makes sure the return on equity covers the initial brokerage expense as well.
When I calculate out the position size I get 36 shares based on your parameters. My calculation allows for brokerage in & out ( A$33 each way in Australia)
( $35.93 - $32.23) / ($200 - (2*$33)) = 36 shares
This method takes account of your 2% risk management limit on your equity base and makes sure the return on equity covers the initial brokerage expense as well.
Originally posted by dberliner
Is this a fibonnaci extension mis-calculation on my part?
look at this chart of MHS.
it broke today the 6/4 DMA and I'm looking to enter above the high of that bar at 35.93 , with a stop at the low of Wave 4 - 32.23.
if I risk 200 $ on this one , I can buy 54 shares. the 1.6 risk/reward ration (at 38.21) , would give me a profit of $120 , which is less than the risk! now , I do understand it gave me 60% of 200$ ,but it should've been 1.6 times the risk , shouldn't it ?
That's the extension number I've seen being used on the videos for risk/reward... So what am I missing here? How am I supposed to calculate risk/reward?
TIA ,
Dana Berliner
Is this a fibonnaci extension mis-calculation on my part?
look at this chart of MHS.
it broke today the 6/4 DMA and I'm looking to enter above the high of that bar at 35.93 , with a stop at the low of Wave 4 - 32.23.
if I risk 200 $ on this one , I can buy 54 shares. the 1.6 risk/reward ration (at 38.21) , would give me a profit of $120 , which is less than the risk! now , I do understand it gave me 60% of 200$ ,but it should've been 1.6 times the risk , shouldn't it ?
That's the extension number I've seen being used on the videos for risk/reward... So what am I missing here? How am I supposed to calculate risk/reward?
TIA ,
Dana Berliner
Comment