Marc (et al) --
Do you know if a higher PTI is actually 'better'. I just read the PTI article and the only question that is unclear is:
a) Does a higher PTI actually have a higher, statistical, odd of being correct than a lower? e.g. If I am evaluating two trades and one has a 37 the other a 54, are they 'the same' -- all other things being equal?
b) If so, and I have conflicting time cross-references, would that be an indicator not to take a trade? e.g. When my 15-Min scale is out of sync w/ my 60-min. If the 60-Min has a 37 and my 15-min has a 62, does that lend credibility to the 15 min even though it's a less-powerful timescale?
(Example. Earlier today, SPX showed a Wave 4 UP on 5-min and a wave 4 down on 15 min. I chose the 15 min as it synced w/ the wave 3 on 60-min).
Thanks all!
Do you know if a higher PTI is actually 'better'. I just read the PTI article and the only question that is unclear is:
a) Does a higher PTI actually have a higher, statistical, odd of being correct than a lower? e.g. If I am evaluating two trades and one has a 37 the other a 54, are they 'the same' -- all other things being equal?
b) If so, and I have conflicting time cross-references, would that be an indicator not to take a trade? e.g. When my 15-Min scale is out of sync w/ my 60-min. If the 60-Min has a 37 and my 15-min has a 62, does that lend credibility to the 15 min even though it's a less-powerful timescale?
(Example. Earlier today, SPX showed a Wave 4 UP on 5-min and a wave 4 down on 15 min. I chose the 15 min as it synced w/ the wave 3 on 60-min).
Thanks all!
Comment