Interesting question. There is a PDF (downloadable in the AGET download area) where an outside firm tested the AGET vs. other strategies.
They suggest a 'WIN' % of 55% w/ a 46% ROI w/ 2:1 margin. They said they had the most success w/ XTL Breakouts. They also said they would do a lot better if they had more experience w/ the tools.
AGET also performed the best overall...
Here's an excerpt:
Test 1A—
1.) Entry after Signal Candle if any one of the following conditions:
a. XTL (blue = long; red = short), and
False Bar Stochastic (oscilator pullback to OB/OS—75/25), or
b. Type 1 (price crossing regression channel), or
c. Type 2 (price crossing the regression channel)
2.) Position size adjusted to maintain $1,000 risk per trade.
3.) Entry 50% ahead of signal candle.
4.) Stop 50% behind signal candle.
5.) Target at 162% Fib level (1.6:1 r/r)
a. ½ position closed at Target
b. Stop moved to break even.
c. Trailing stops at Fractal.
Personally, I still consider myself learning & refuse to calculate how much I am losing -- though, overall, it's break-even thus far. Not a good record in a bull market. But...
Comment