Possible Z-Order Glitch?

[mikejhelms]

Hi. Is there a glitch in the Z-Order of the newest version (V 10.1879.975) of eSignal? To illustrate my point I’m using Version 2.0 of your Heikin-Ashi study. The following is the description at the top of the study:

***************************
Provided By : eSignal. (c) Copyright 2003
EFS Formula : Heikin-Ashi

Version 2.0

9/13/2004

Notes:
* Non-price study
* Draws most recent 200 bars
* Formula Parameters
- Bullish Color Default: Green
- Bearish Color Default: Red
- Smoothing Default: None [None, T3, KAMA]
* 2.0 Added T3 and KAMA smoothing options per
http://warrants.bnpparibas.com/de/doc/WZ_0804.pdf (page 16)

*****************************

Below are images of the study when it is run in eSignal V 10.5.1721.1140 and in eSignal V 10.1879.975. When run under the earlier version, all is well. But when run under the newer version the lines draw to represent the spread between HaHigh and HaLow appear on top of the lines draw to show the spread between HaOpen and HaClose. I thought the simple fix would be to reverse the order of the drawn lines within the formula, that is have HaHigh to Halow drawn before HaOpen to HaClose but that made no difference. Am I missing something, as is usually the case, or is this a minor but irritating glitch? Thanks.

Mike

[mikejhelms]

Z-Order follow-up

I can't seem to upload the images that demonstrate the possible Z-Order glitch that I described in the previous post. But if you're interested you can try running that study under the two versions I mentioned and compare the results.

Mike