Hi,
I have been using Qlink 2.0 for a long time ago and recently tried Qlink 3.0. After took sometime the new stuffs and found my findings as follows:
3.0 vs. 2.0
1. Now the RTD link can include some reference cells from Excel ----> easier and more flexible to the the same result
2. Every time when I open excel file with RTD links. it will automatically update all the links. (no optional for selecting update or not). So you cannot preserve the previous data record.
3. the refresh speed on RTD is slower than DDE link. especially if an excel file has over 200 links together with different cell calculations. DDE performs very much better.
4. there is an old bug on Qlink 2.0 is sometimes it cannot update the links even to restart the Qlink or Excel program....It is very annoying task.
Conclusions.
Both 2.0 and 3.0 have their strength. and since different users out there with different needs and requirements, I hope esignals can keep both RTD and DDE option in Qlink now and forever release.
Thanks
I have been using Qlink 2.0 for a long time ago and recently tried Qlink 3.0. After took sometime the new stuffs and found my findings as follows:
3.0 vs. 2.0
1. Now the RTD link can include some reference cells from Excel ----> easier and more flexible to the the same result
2. Every time when I open excel file with RTD links. it will automatically update all the links. (no optional for selecting update or not). So you cannot preserve the previous data record.
3. the refresh speed on RTD is slower than DDE link. especially if an excel file has over 200 links together with different cell calculations. DDE performs very much better.
4. there is an old bug on Qlink 2.0 is sometimes it cannot update the links even to restart the Qlink or Excel program....It is very annoying task.
Conclusions.
Both 2.0 and 3.0 have their strength. and since different users out there with different needs and requirements, I hope esignals can keep both RTD and DDE option in Qlink now and forever release.
Thanks
Comment