eSignal Limitations & Performance

[calvis]

I've moved to the new tick server but still get the same results - only about 37 charts load.

[gspiker]

Dave180,

Thanks for the suggestion. I just tried it for the third time, and it doesn't seem to make a difference... I'm not sure how the data manager caches data, but it doesn't seem to be cache the data from the downloader for me.

Garth

[Dave180]

gspiker
I've also just had a problem with a couple of the servers not delivering tick data (ES) despite using the method I suggested - it used to work, and I think still does improve the ease with which a dynamic chart gets the backfill you want, but obviously not as helpful as it was.

In another thread I've posted the server connections that were noted by netstat during these faulty connections, maybe that will help eSignal can actually look into the problem, odd that whenever their guys test the servers they never get the same problems, especially so as in August I managed to get a LiveRep person to reproduce the issue of not getting historic bars, however when I brought it up again in October the same LiveRep person denied that such a problem had ever been reported. So not holding my breath!

[atlas]

If I really need the (tick) history, I use a Standard chart, (and set to 10 days).

[gspiker]

Scott, Jason,

Can someone from eSignal let us know when an EA/Beta version of eSignal is available that addresses the performance issues described in this thread?

It would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

Garth

[ScottJ]

We're about 3 weeks out from posting 10.1 to on our download page. We may release as a beta prior to that as well.

Thanks.

[gspiker]

Thanks Scott. Looking forward to it.

Garth