Unfortunately, this has now either been rescaled
or totally screwed up. If it's been rescaled, how
do I read it ? Is it the number of trades divided by
1000? divided by 100? or what ? Even worse,
it looks like if there are less than 1000 trades,
it is *not* rescaled. So TiV = 460 (example SCHB)
means 460 trades but TiV = 180.67 (example F) means
180,670 ???
And, notice that this scaling inconsistency renders the field
incorrectly SORTABLE. This is similar to the Market Cap mistake of making it Unsortable. I sort on TiV all the time.
Now, you can sort it, but it will sort incorrectly because of the
< 1000, > 1000 issue.
This is nonsense!
My request: please REVERT it to the way it was.
Thanks!
-alan
or totally screwed up. If it's been rescaled, how
do I read it ? Is it the number of trades divided by
1000? divided by 100? or what ? Even worse,
it looks like if there are less than 1000 trades,
it is *not* rescaled. So TiV = 460 (example SCHB)
means 460 trades but TiV = 180.67 (example F) means
180,670 ???
And, notice that this scaling inconsistency renders the field
incorrectly SORTABLE. This is similar to the Market Cap mistake of making it Unsortable. I sort on TiV all the time.
Now, you can sort it, but it will sort incorrectly because of the
< 1000, > 1000 issue.
This is nonsense!
My request: please REVERT it to the way it was.
Thanks!
-alan
Comment