Tweet
I am surprised this hasn't been mentioned in here. I kept waiting to see if anyone would bring it up. Awhile back I started to notice that for the ES contract the net field no longer reports in the appropriate .25 minimum tick increment, but it now shows things like +0.05, -0.85, and so on, instead of +0.50 or -1.25. Why is this, and is there any planned fix for this? Thanks.
-
-
Re: Problem with ES 'net' field
Trader 1618
You may want to see the explanation by AveryH in this thread on a similar topic
Alex
Originally posted by Trader 1618
I am surprised this hasn't been mentioned in here. I kept waiting to see if anyone would bring it up. Awhile back I started to notice that for the ES contract the net field no longer reports in the appropriate .25 minimum tick increment, but it now shows things like +0.05, -0.85, and so on, instead of +0.50 or -1.25. Why is this, and is there any planned fix for this? Thanks. -
Thanks, Alex. I'm sorry to post a question that has already been answered elsewhere. I looked and looked and couldn't find anything. It did mention a solution being implemented as of yesterday, so hopefully it will work. I see the sense of a settlement value not on an even ES 0.25 tick because it is fungible with the 'big', which trades in 0.10 increments.Comment
-
Trader 1618
You are most welcome
Alex
Originally posted by Trader 1618
Thanks, Alex. I'm sorry to post a question that has already been answered elsewhere. I looked and looked and couldn't find anything. It did mention a solution being implemented as of yesterday, so hopefully it will work. I see the sense of a settlement value not on an even ES 0.25 tick because it is fungible with the 'big', which trades in 0.10 increments.Comment
Comment