Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Signal clarity

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ok...lets take the original and roll with it. So, were going to use the FGallFalse.efs right? If so, I am all over it!

    Fibbgann
    Excellent book on JavaScript for beginners

    Comment


    • go for it!

      and use 120 days of data, your cpu will hate it but I think you need to do as long a time as possible

      Comment


      • FG

        If you want me to run some of the iterations, let me know.

        Maybe I can do the cci's from 10-30 step 1, with the sto and rsi constant.

        If so, let's each a couple of the same numbers and make sure our results compare.

        Comment


        • Yeah to bad esignal crashes every time I do this! Sure you name it
          Excellent book on JavaScript for beginners

          Comment


          • Re: Reply to post 'Signal clarity'

            Still running that TRS 80?

            >

            Comment


            • LOL, oh that was a killer! Actually I am running a power house. 2 GIG of ram and 6.8 GIG processor. I have 2 pentium 3.4 dual channel XEONS with hyperthreading. I think I have enough.

              TRS80 that was great!

              Fibbgann
              Excellent book on JavaScript for beginners

              Comment


              • I tryed to backtest but, it is crashing esignal everytime. i can backtest a bunch of other efs's. But, this one is instantly killing esignal. I tried on 2 diferent versions on 2 different workstations.
                You having any luck?


                Fibbgann
                Excellent book on JavaScript for beginners

                Comment


                • Just to clarify...my comment was that CCI and RSI are similar in theory and similar in represntation. I was suggesting using something other than CCI and RSI - be it MACD, BBAND or whatever...just something that represents a differentiation.

                  And once again I will repeat. Using the amount of intraday data available, I would not draw ANY conclution as to which indicators or settings on those indicators work best. Tuning for 15 minutes with 3 months worth of data will be very misleading. All it will tell you is how well this works on a 15 minute ES basis during a bear market rally.

                  If you really want to do that kind of work, switch to daily and then you have years worth of data to work with...many many more bars that run from a bull to bull market retraces to bears to bear market rally's and everything inbetween.

                  Garth
                  Garth

                  Comment


                  • Re: Reply to post 'Signal clarity'

                    FG

                    BackTesting fine here, suggest you try a trs80.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Reply to post 'Signal clarity'

                      Not sure what this means but here goes...

                      I ran some backtests using 5 minute data for 120 days, varying the cii from
                      10 to 30 in steps of two, plus I did 15 and 25. The RSI and Stochastic
                      values where left unchanged.

                      cci profit
                      10 3812
                      12 4037
                      14 4312
                      15 3712
                      16 4362
                      18 4137
                      20 3087
                      22 3712
                      24 3637
                      25 3012
                      26 4475 **
                      28 5100 **
                      30 4487 **


                      I agree with what Garth said - this is only 120 days of 5 min data in a bear
                      rally - but does this data suggest any thing for further testing?

                      Note: the three largest returns are from 26, 28 and 30.

                      Comment


                      • Dloomis I am sorry, but as I stated below. This efs is crashing my Esignal. I have tried others and have no problem. Not sure what the cause of this might be?

                        Fibbgann
                        Excellent book on JavaScript for beginners

                        Comment


                        • Re: Reply to post 'Signal clarity'

                          FYI

                          I just received a long signal at 1075.25

                          ----- Original Message -----
                          From: <[email protected]>
                          To: <[email protected]>
                          Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 1:11 PM
                          Subject: Reply to post 'Signal clarity'


                          > Hello dloomis,
                          >
                          > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          >

                          Comment


                          • Which efs. are you using? Because I am still getting instant crashes. I would like to be testing since the market is junk.

                            Fibbgann
                            Excellent book on JavaScript for beginners

                            Comment


                            • Re: Reply to post 'Signal clarity'

                              FG

                              send me an email and I send you the one I am using

                              [email protected]

                              Comment


                              • David
                                Why don't you post it here as an attachment? At this point I too am not sure as to which one we should all be on (even though I am not having problems backtesting any of them).
                                Alex

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X